Home

Forum

Networking

Tips & Tricks

Performance

Knowledge Base

 

 

 

Update: 5/25/01

Today I received what appears to be a "new" monthly newsletter that Starband appears to be getting off the ground.  This, in my humble opinion, is a very positive move on their part.

Is Starband for me?
by Ken Knight

Because of the numerous emails that I receive asking my opinion of the Starband and how it works, I decided it might be best to just provide you with the information here.  The idea here is to clarify exactly what you can and can't do with a Starband unit.  Some of these things may change with the release of the new model 360 modem, but this is how it stands right now. 

First and foremost, most applications that work with TCP/IP can be made to work with a Starband connection, the key here is the definition of "work".   In some of these cases, "work" means slower than dial-up and because of Latency, much more aggravating.

Latency

    "So what is this Latency I keep hearing about?"  Latency is the delay caused by the distance between your computer and the computer you're trying to talk to.  Using wired technologies, you might have a couple thousand miles to travel to reach your destination computer.  However, with Starband, because you're going up to a Satellite and then back down to their Network operations, the distance is more like 46,000 miles.  Because of this a packet traveling over to them and then back to you will average around a second.  This may not seem like much, but when you compare this to regular wired technology seeing that same back travel to and back in under 200 milliseconds with most dial-ups and 60 milliseconds with DSL and Cable modems, that's quite a contrast.

Some protocols are slow

    Starband plainly states on their site that they don't work with "real-time" technologies such as Telnet, VPN, on-line gaming and voice / video over IP, but people clearly overlook this and jump right in anyway and then start complaining because it's so slow.

Uploads and Downloads

    At the time of this writing, Starband has modified their web site to reflect these items, however, when myself and many others bought into this they were touting 500 down and 150 up.  They've also changed this to reflect the actual numbers on the upload side that some are seeing, which is 40 to 60 upload.  As you can see the 40 to 60 is around a third of what was originally advertised.  And the people who see the 60 are like finding 7 foot tall people, while they do exist, they're few and far between.  I would have to say that from the emails I've received and the posts in the forums and newsgroups that between 25 and 40 are closer to actual numbers on the upload side.  I personally never see anything above around 38.

Web developers pay attention!

    Another item worth mentioning is that of maintaining websites like this one.  If you spend a lot of your time performing this type of function, especially via FTP, then you might want to re-evaluate Starband or consider maintaining a dialup account for this purpose.  I develop websites for my clients along with this site, and because of the current issues with FTPing through Starband, I quite frequently drop back to dial-up to maintain these sites.  I currently connect through dial-up at 50,666 and no less then 48,000.  So, for myself, it's ten times faster to utilize FTP through dial-up then through Starband for uploading and site maintenance.  This also holds true for Telnet.

What about support?

    This subject could spark a wildfire in the forums and experiences vary widely.  Starband uses a "Level" system of support.  There's "Level 1" support which is what you get when you first call them on the phone and then if Level 1 can't solve the problem it gets escalated to a Level 2 technician.  I can honestly say that I've been very impressed with their Level 2 technical support people.  They're knowledgeable, courteous and show desire to help correct whatever problems may arise.  For the most part, my experience with Level 1 techs has been pretty good.  I have had a couple that just acted like they didn't care, however, I don't won't tag the whole crew as being like this.  The big concern that I have is that they are not very informed.  It's like there is a loss of communications between what's actually happening on their networks and what they're being told.

    This also holds true between Starband the company and it's customers.  They could do a MUCH better job of keeping their customers informed of problems, updates to the system and new product information.  From a few of the beta testers that I've spoken with, they were at one point in time receiving weekly updates on what Starband was up to as far as the network was concerned.  They have made some improvements in this are but could honestly take a lesson from themselves and provide this communication to their paying customers also.

Well, I think this about sums it up.  I hope that you've learned something about the product you're considering investing in.  For those of us who don't have any other options, Starband is better than sliced bread!

 


 updated: May 25th, 2001